OPERATING SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS AGENTS
AGENTOS ENTERPRISE ASSURANCE // Global AI Governance & Technical Red-Teaming Portal

The Unified Standard for Enterprise AI Governance & Red Teaming

A definitive dual-pillar assurance platform for enterprise AI systems. Audit organizational policy and compliance readiness with EI-GDA (Evidence-driven Intelligent Governance & Digital Assurance) and stress-test model robustness with SILA (Safety and Integrity Lab for AI Red Teaming) against ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, and OWASP LLM Top 10.

EI-GDA ASSURANCE

Platform 01: EI-GDA

Evidence-driven Intelligent Governance & Digital Assurance: Automated policy and evidence auditing tool mapping algorithmic data lineage, corporate accountability, and risk controls against ISO/IEC 42001 and NIST AI RMF.

Launch Governance Audit
SILA RED TEAMING LAB

Environment 02: SILA Red Teaming

Safety and Integrity Lab for AI Red Teaming: Advanced empirical laboratory for automated adversarial jailbreak fuzzing, prompt injection resistance, demographic fairness parity, and inference robustness benchmarking.

Initialize SILA Red Teaming
DUAL-PILLAR TOPOLOGY

Comprehensive AI Trust & Safety Infrastructure

True enterprise assurance requires both structural governance compliance and empirical technical stress-testing. AgentOS unifies both layers into a single verifiable workflow.

Policy & Evidence Layer

1. EI-GDA (Governance & Digital Assurance)

Evaluates institutional policy readiness, algorithmic data lineage, personal data protection (GDPR/CCPA/privacy frameworks), and enterprise risk management under ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, and the EU AI Act.

Automated AI policy and evidentiary artifact verification
Algorithmic governance gap analysis and maturity scoring
Actionable risk remediation and digital assurance roadmap
Empirical Technical Sandbox

2. SILA Red Teaming (Safety & Integrity Lab)

Production-grade sandbox for red-teaming Foundation LLMs, Computer Vision models, and Predictive AI systems against sophisticated adversarial attack vectors and drift.

Automated Red-Teaming & Fuzzing (Jailbreak / Prompt Injection)
Algorithmic Fairness, Demographic Parity & Bias Mitigation
Hyperparameter Sensitivity & Adversarial Stress Testing
INTERACTIVE DEMO LAB

Live Interactive Policy & Red-Teaming Simulator

Experience real-time evidence-driven governance auditing (EI-GDA) and adversarial model red-teaming (SILA) with live diagnostic scoring and gap reporting.

Policy Document Excerpt:GOVERNANCE AUDIT

TARGET: ENTERPRISE AUTONOMOUS AGENT SWARM DEPLOYMENT POLICY

"Enterprise Autonomous Workforce Governance Directive (AIMS-01): - All autonomous agents operating with external tool access must possess a verifiable RS256 JWT cryptographic identity with maximum 15-minute token expiry. - Every tool invocation and financial transaction requires pre-execution Layer 4 BudgetGuard validation and pessimistic row-locking (SELECT ... FOR UPDATE). - Third-party API credentials must never be passed to LLM prompts or agent memory; credentials reside strictly within an AES-256-GCM Zero-Knowledge Secret Vault. - Any agent run dropping below a calibrated Grounding Score of 0.70 must immediately trigger automated quarantine and token revocation."

Composite Governance Score94%
StatusCONFORMANT
5 Core Principles Compliance Index
Transparency & Explainability94%
Privacy & Data Governance (PDPA)96%
Human Accountability (HITL)91%
Robustness & Security95%
Legal & Ethical Conformance93%
Identified Governance Gaps
Lacks explicit indemnification terms for autonomous agent multi-signature escrow disputes.
Requires formalized human-in-the-loop (HITL) manual overrides for operations exceeding $500 threshold.
Want to certify your actual production model with official ISO 42001 compliance?
Proceed To Official Quote
OPEN BENCHMARK SUITES

Public AI Benchmark Suites for Empirical Red-Teaming

Standardized open-source benchmark suites for rigorous model evaluation across 3 high-stakes enterprise domains, each tested along Accuracy, Bias, and Parameter Stability dimensions.

Regulatory Compliance & Statutory Jurisprudence

Enterprise Regulatory & Legal AI Benchmark

Inspect on GitHub

Standardized benchmark suite for evaluating AI models in statutory interpretation, contractual risk extraction, regulatory compliance analysis, and corporate legal advisory with strict zero-hallucination thresholds.

Regulatory ComplianceStatutory InterpretationContract AnalysisZero-HallucinationOpen Benchmark
3 Mandatory Testing Dimensions:

Accuracy & Precision (Legal QA & Statutory Citation)

Measures factual recall and statutory precision in multi-clause regulatory disputes, verifying exact citation mapping and eliminating hallucinated precedents.

Sample Test Scenario:

Evaluating cross-border personal data transfer provisions under GDPR Article 46 Standard Contractual Clauses vs. regional statutory exemptions.

Key Evaluation Metrics:
Statutory Citation Precision (99%+)
Legal F1-Score (0.94)
Hallucination Rate (< 0.5%)
Multi-Jurisdiction Synthesis
Target Model Classes:Enterprise Legal LLMsRegulatory Compliance RAGContract Auditing Swarms
Test this Benchmark in Simulator
GLOBAL REGULATORY ALIGNMENT

Supported Global Standards & Compliance Frameworks

Engineered to satisfy the world's most rigorous AI risk management frameworks and statutory mandates.

Policy / Governance
ISO/IEC 42001:2023

Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS)

The premier global management standard specifying enterprise requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS).

Core Evaluation Controls:
Risk GovernanceData Quality & LineageContinuous ImprovementLifecycle Transparency
VIEW ASSESSMENT SCOPE
Dual Scope
NIST AI RMF 1.0

NIST AI Risk Management Framework 1.0

Foundational guidance framework providing practical, risk-based methodologies to improve the trustworthiness and safety of AI systems across 4 core functions: GOVERN, MAP, MEASURE, and MANAGE.

Core Evaluation Controls:
GOVERN (Oversight)MAP (Context & Impact)MEASURE (Analysis & Testing)MANAGE (Risk Mitigation)
VIEW ASSESSMENT SCOPE
Dual Scope
EU AI Act (2024/1689)

European Union Harmonised Rules on AI

Comprehensive statutory regulation establishing a risk-categorized regulatory baseline for AI systems operating in global commerce, covering high-risk classification, transparency, and automated incident reporting.

Core Evaluation Controls:
High-Risk ConformityFundamental Rights ImpactTechnical DocumentationHuman Oversight (HITL)
VIEW ASSESSMENT SCOPE
Policy / Governance
ISO/IEC 23894:2023

Information Technology — AI — Risk Management

Provides structured guidance on managing AI-specific risks faced by organizations throughout the entire system lifecycle, fully harmonized with ISO 31000 risk management principles.

Core Evaluation Controls:
Risk IdentificationImpact Horizon AnalysisSafety BoundariesStakeholder Review
VIEW ASSESSMENT SCOPE
Technical Standard
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs & GenAI

OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications

The global security benchmark cataloging the most critical security vulnerabilities found in LLM deployments, including Prompt Injection, Sensitive Data Disclosure, and Insecure Output Handling.

Core Evaluation Controls:
Prompt Injection (LLM01)Insecure Output (LLM02)Training Data Poisoning (LLM03)Model Denial of Service (LLM04)
VIEW ASSESSMENT SCOPE
Policy / Governance
IEEE 7000-2021

Model Process for Addressing Ethical Concerns in System Design

International standard establishing a structured systems-engineering methodology to address ethical values, transparency, and human well-being from early system conceptualization through retirement.

Core Evaluation Controls:
Ethical Value ElicitationTransparency ControlsSystem Boundary ValidationAccountability Audits
VIEW ASSESSMENT SCOPE
Policy / Governance
OECD AI Principles

OECD Principles on Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

Intergovernmental values-based principles promoting innovative, trustworthy AI that respects human rights, democratic values, robust cybersecurity, and verifiable algorithmic accountability.

Core Evaluation Controls:
Inclusive GrowthHuman-Centric ValuesTransparency & ExplainabilityRobustness & Security
VIEW ASSESSMENT SCOPE
CERTIFICATION LIFECYCLE

4-Stage Independent Certification Journey

A deterministic, transparent process delivering verifiable compliance for your enterprise AI workforce.

01
INTAKE & SCOPING

1. Intake & Evidentiary Discovery

Register AI system scope, upload corporate policy documents, system prompts, and architectural topology.

STEP 1 OF 4READY
02
EI-GDA ASSURANCE

2. Governance Assurance (EI-GDA)

Automated engine cross-references evidence against ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF with independent expert review.

STEP 2 OF 4READY
03
SILA RED TEAMING

3. Empirical Red-Teaming (SILA)

Connect model weights or sandbox API to SILA for automated jailbreak fuzzing, injection defense, and bias audits.

STEP 3 OF 4READY
04
CRYPTOGRAPHIC SEAL

4. Cryptographic Trustmark Issuance

Receive formal certification report and an immutable SHA-256 Digital Trustmark recorded on the Layer 6 ledger.

STEP 4 OF 4READY
TARGET BENEFICIARIES

Ecosystem Value Across Enterprise Principals

Built to elevate trust, reduce corporate liability, and verify safety for mission-critical AI adoption.

Government & Regulatory Authorities

Enforce public safety, accountability, and citizen trust with standardized evidentiary frameworks.

Unified assessment criteria aligned directly with ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, and OECD principles.
Automated privacy and data governance validation prior to public service deployment.
Immutable Layer 6 audit trails and formal risk diagnostics for institutional accountability.
Verifiable Digital Trustmark seals enabling seamless public verification.

Enterprise Leadership & Regulated Sectors

Mitigate catastrophic legal risk, protect corporate IP, and accelerate compliant AI commercialization.

Actionable gap analysis detailing exact regulatory exposure and step-by-step mitigation plans.
Full compliance with stringent mandates across FinTech, Healthcare, and Critical Infrastructure.
Zero-knowledge isolation preventing proprietary corporate data and customer PII leakage.
Cryptographically verifiable Trustmarks strengthening partner, insurer, and investor confidence.

AI Engineers & Foundation Model Labs

Empirically validate robustness, eliminate jailbreak vulnerabilities, and ensure deterministic outputs.

Automated Red-Teaming suites simulating multi-turn jailbreaks, prompt injections, and data extraction.
Comprehensive demographic parity and localized bias detection across diverse user cohorts.
Hyperparameter determinism stress-testing measuring stability across temperature and context sweeps.
Architectural security guidance on tool permission sandboxing and autonomous agent containment.
KNOWLEDGE BASE

Frequently Asked Questions

Technical and operational insights regarding the EI-GDA Assurance framework and SILA Red Teaming Lab.

They operate as two interconnected pillars of complete enterprise AI assurance: (1) EI-GDA (Evidence-driven Intelligent Governance & Digital Assurance) audits organizational policies, accountability structures, data lineage, and privacy regulations (ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act); (2) SILA (Safety and Integrity Lab for AI Red Teaming) acts as an empirical technical sandbox stress-testing model weights, prompt injection defenses, bias mitigation, and inference stability.

Need Assistance or Portal Access?

Connect with our AI governance officers for guided consultation and sandbox provisioning.

Commercial Quote Engine & Digital Trustmark Ledger

Calculate Certification Quote & Issue Digital Trustmark

Deterministic real-time quote calculation based on model modality and regulatory risk tier. Certified systems receive an immutable SHA-256 seal.

1. Select Certification Track
EI-GDA Policy Assurance
$1,500

Evidence-driven policy review for ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, and EU AI Act compliance.

SILA Technical Red-Teaming
$2,500

Empirical stress-testing: jailbreaks, PII exfiltration, prompt injection, and tool misuse fuzzing.

Full Dual Certification (Policy + Red-Team)
$3,400

Both tracks combined with 15% package discount + Official Digital Trustmark issuance.

2. System Architecture Modality

Text-Only LLM

INCLUDED

Multimodal (Vision/Audio)

+$600

Autonomous Agent Swarm

+$900

3. Regulatory Risk Classification Tier

Minimal Risk

1x Multiplier

Limited Risk

1.2x Multiplier

High Risk

1.5x Multiplier

4. SLA & Turnaround Options
5. Enterprise System Intake

Itemized Quote Estimate

// Deterministic Parity

10-DAY SLA
Full Dual Certification (Policy + Red-Team)$3,400

Both tracks combined with 15% package discount + Official Digital Trustmark issuance.

Total One-Time$3,400

// Included Compliance Deliverables

  • ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AIMS Technical Alignment
  • NIST AI RMF 1.0 (Govern, Map, Measure, Manage)
  • EU AI Act (2024/1689) & Data Governance
  • Cryptographic Digital Trustmark & Ledger Seal

Quote estimates reflect standard system scope based on self-reported architecture parameters. Complex custom pipelines or bespoke on-premises models may be subject to scoping review.

Verify Existing Trustmark